Rural_America_Main_Street

West Virginia study details promising method for estimating rural intravenous drug use

A study published today in the American Journal of Public Health estimates that 1,857 people injected drugs in the last six months in Cabell County, W.Va., a rural county with a population of 94,958. This estimate is based on an innovative survey technique that public health officials can now use in their own rural communities to address the opioid epidemic.

The study was led by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in collaboration with the Cabell-Huntington Health Department.

For their study, the researchers surveyed the population of people who inject drugs to understand their drug use and needs for essential public health services, including drug treatment and overdose prevention resources. Using these data, the study team was able to quantify the size and characteristics of the population of people who inject drugs. The study also found that most people who inject drugs in the county are white (83.4 percent), male (59.5 percent) and under age 40 (70.9 percent). Many reported injecting heroin (82.0 percent), crystal methamphetamine (71.0 percent) and fentanyl (56.3 percent) in the past six months.

Link to full article here originally posted on:

Science Daily Logo

ManWalkingOnLog

Opioid Prescription Rates Higher in Rural Counties

Opioid prescribing rates among primary care providers are significantly higher in rural U.S. counties than their more populated counterparts, a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows.

For the study, researchers analyzed deidentified opioid prescription data for more than 30,000 primary care providers. The information covered January 2014 to March 2017, and was obtained from electronic health record vendor Athenahealth. To compare trends by population density, researchers stratified the data by providers’ counties into six urban-rural categories, ranging from most to least densely populated.

Link to full article here originally posted on:

Predicting, Preventing Spread of Opioid Epidemic in Rural and Micropolitan Areas

The rapid increase of opioid overdose deaths in rural communities across the country has far outpaced the overdose rate in urban areas, and an Iowa State University-led research team wants to know why.

The researchers’ goal is to identify prevention strategies and use big data to predict which communities may be at risk, said David Peters, an associate professor of rural sociology at Iowa State who is leading the five-year project. Andrew Hochstetler, a professor of sociology, and Eric Davis, an assistant professor of computer science, are working with Peters along with researchers from the University of Iowa and Syracuse University. The team received a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to fund the work.

Rural areas hit hardest by the opioid epidemic have often experienced some type of economic shock, Peters said. In many cases, manufacturing plants have closed or farms have consolidated, resulting in a loss of jobs. Peters says such hardship does not automatically put a community at risk for increased opioid use, but there appears to be a connection between how the community responds to economic decline and its risk.

Graph Opioid Epidemic By The Numbers

“We think local action plays a role in why some of these communities are more resilient in the face of the opioid crisis and why others are not,” Peters said. “The opioid epidemic seems to be centered in areas where it’s not just economic decline, but there’s a decline in everything – infrastructure, buildings, quality of life. The community is a withering place.”

Learning from communities

There is limited research on the factors driving the opioid epidemic and no evidence-based strategies for how communities can minimize or prevent it, Peters said. Previous research of economically distressed communities shows residents tend to disengage and social networks start to break down. Hochstetler says residents may be less likely to monitor public spaces or work with police to reduce crime.

“With this level of disorganization we see a shift in cultural norms that makes a community less likely to condemn illicit behavior and prevent crime,” Hochstetler said. “If communities are not proactive and that economic shock leads to higher poverty and crime rates, graffiti, trash and abandoned buildings – you’re going to have more social problems.”

Researchers will work directly with those affected by opioids to collect data and identify what has and hasn’t worked in fighting the epidemic. They are developing an advisory panel, which will include law enforcement and court officials, public health experts, city and county leaders and medical professionals, as well as former addicts and family members, to help guide their research, Peters said.

The work will focus specifically on rural areas and micropolitan communities – populations between 10,000 and 50,000 – in different regions of the country. Researchers expect to find differences in rural areas driven by farming, forestry and mining, and want to develop appropriate strategies based on those economic factors.

Predicting risk with big data

A concern for researchers and communities alike is the lag time for data on opioid arrests and deaths, Peters said. The data can help identify potential problems, but the most recent statistics are often two years old. Researchers want to eliminate this barrier by using big data to develop a real-time opioid risk indicator for communities.

“To predict a community’s risk, we must understand the local dynamics, the community’s connectivity to other areas and the risks there,” Davis said. “We don’t yet know how all the indicators for opioids are linked, but we’re going to look at data on people, economic situations, previous risk in the area and potential trafficking patterns. All of this data combined should help form a picture of the local risk.”

The ability to predict is what will set this risk indicator apart from other data sources. If researchers are successful, communities can use the tool to identify the risk and take action before it becomes a larger problem. Researchers will test the tool in 12 communities as part of the five-year project.

Article here on www.news.iastate.edu.